Comments on: Yuckblog 3: Attack a Snak v Lunch Pack

By: Terence

Terence — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 16:16:25 +0000

I don’t normally like to shout but WHY AREN’T THERE LAWS AGAINST BRUTALLY EXCESSIVE PACKAGING LIKE THIS?!?

By: Paul

Paul — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:10:36 +0000

I have has Russian smoked cheese that is stringy and salt. Great bar snack.

By: George

George — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 10:50:29 +0000

The crackers won’t go soft – those with sharp eyes will have noticed the clever chaps at Cathedral City have sealed all the way around the cheese and pickles, which stops the spread of damp

By: Ici

Ici — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 07:33:44 +0000

A friend of mine once tried Cheesestrings and he sent me a text explaining his disappointment in the fact that it was neither cheese, nor string…

By: Arsenik

Arsenik — Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:33:00 +0000

Did the Attack-a-Snack happen to have mechanically seperated anything included in the 29 ingredients listed? My guess is yes, which would explain the chicken aftertaste when the product is touted as ham.

By: 3

Fri, 12 Dec 2008 23:14:41 +0000

The first thing that came to mind upon viewing that paper thin flesh derivative was when I had to dissect a rat in Biology.

All joking aside, and not to sound off like Jamie “wanker” Oliver, but the thought that any human should consider the Cheesestring affair worth eating (or consider it worthy eating for their child) is depressing as hell.

Ban this filth.

By: Nick

Nick — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:32:31 +0000

The lunch pack is great as it shows there is just no need for the greasy salty MRM slice or the plastic cheesealike material. I’m suprised the crackers aren’t a bit damp and stale from the moisture in the pickle.

By: Helen

Helen — Fri, 17 Oct 2008 21:21:07 +0000

Good god, I can’t quite believe the flacid pink sweaty stuff. That is possibly the most disgusting thing I have seen all week. I have heard of the cheesestring but thought it was just an urban myth.